Apologies for the lack of posts. Been a little busy with some projects.
In my last post on APW (December 1, 2014 click here) the unit price was 11.5c and I took the view it was worth on holding on for further gains given the massive discount to NTA and lots of cash.
That view proved to be correct.
The price has marched forward to 14.5c. NTA has also marched forward to 18.52c, thanks to further buy-backs and movement in the underlying NTA.
Controversially has management changed its investment guidelines to allow it be 100% invested in one security or manager. I read this as meaning APW could be fully invested in other AIMS securities. Management has stated previously it intends (and has done) to invest in other AIMS securities. Some people despise this given the potential conflict of interest it creates. Judging by the strengthened share price, it seems that on-balance the market seems to be fairly comfortable with this. As previously stated I am little more indifferent to this: I can see both sides of the argument.
I have gradually sold down my position completely, although regrettably less than the current price. I took the view - possibly incorrectly - the price may never reach NTA. I tend to find with these types of situations you need to be really cheap and sell cheap. Please don't take that as gospel, and clearly I was premature in this case. My original investment case was buying at ~50% discount to NTA and the view the NTA should grow over time. The discount has closed (but not fully) and the NTA has grown, so the investment case has worked out. Personally I'd be happy to buy back-in at cheaper prices.
Kristian
Disclosure: no position in APW
That view proved to be correct.
The price has marched forward to 14.5c. NTA has also marched forward to 18.52c, thanks to further buy-backs and movement in the underlying NTA.
Controversially has management changed its investment guidelines to allow it be 100% invested in one security or manager. I read this as meaning APW could be fully invested in other AIMS securities. Management has stated previously it intends (and has done) to invest in other AIMS securities. Some people despise this given the potential conflict of interest it creates. Judging by the strengthened share price, it seems that on-balance the market seems to be fairly comfortable with this. As previously stated I am little more indifferent to this: I can see both sides of the argument.
I have gradually sold down my position completely, although regrettably less than the current price. I took the view - possibly incorrectly - the price may never reach NTA. I tend to find with these types of situations you need to be really cheap and sell cheap. Please don't take that as gospel, and clearly I was premature in this case. My original investment case was buying at ~50% discount to NTA and the view the NTA should grow over time. The discount has closed (but not fully) and the NTA has grown, so the investment case has worked out. Personally I'd be happy to buy back-in at cheaper prices.
Kristian
Disclosure: no position in APW



