Wednesday, 24 December 2014

Thank-you

Just a short note to say thank-you to the various people who have reached out to me over the year to discuss ideas and strategy and provide feedback. This has helped me immensely, and I can't thank enough both the many professional and private investors who give me their time and I hope in some way I have helped people too. 

Have a great festive season. 

Thanks a lot. 

Kristian 

Thursday, 11 December 2014

Third Link Growth Fund


The team at Harness Asset Management is proud to announce that we have joined the stable of fund managers responsible for looking after capital in the Third Link Growth Fund founded by market veteran Chris Cuffe. 

Member fund managers surrender their fees which, are allocated to a selection of children's charities. 

Monday, 8 December 2014

What's happened to takeover arbitrages?

Getting straight to the point, it just doesn't seem that trading takeover arbitrages makes money these days. If anything, the way to make money from takeovers is to short the takeover target, although I certainly do not advocate or practise that strategy. For me, the most profitable and stress avoiding thing to do is just walk away and look for easier ways to make money. 

Before I go on, if you are unfamiliar with the term 'takeover arbitrage', it means buying the takeover target after the takeover has been announced. The ideal takeover is a binding, all-cash offer as it theoretically reduces risk, and leaves upside exposure should a higher bid(s) come along. 

The problem however is that bids can and do fall over and the downside can be horrible, especially compared to the upside. To use the three most common words in finance, there is often no 'margin of safety'. 

There are two reasons why I find it hard to get excited about takeovers these days: 1. many are 'indicative, conditional and non-binding' and 2. plenty of takeovers are just dodgy. 

Treasury Wine Estates (TWE) had not one but two conditional offers and still a deal could not be finalised:

Graincorp still hasn't recovered after the government knocked back the takeover: 


The recent collapse of the Reef Casino (RCT) was just plain fishy and regardless of what the actual truth is, the takeover arbitrageurs got a spanking: 


The mining sector is littered with failed takeover attempts, despite often superficially valid takeover bids on the table. 

Warrnambool Cheese and Butter (WCB) has been the only (that I can think of) truly success takeover arbitrage story from the past few years: 


I haven't traded a takeover for well over two years now, and apart from the very occasional sitting duck that has lots of embedded value, I can't see me trading too many in the future either. Please contact me if you disagree! 

Kristian 

Disclosure: no position in any of the above names

Monday, 1 December 2014

AIMS Property Securities Fund (APW)

I last wrote about APW back in May. Back then, the unit price was 10c and the NTA 15c. Now, the unit price is 11.5c and the NTA 18.1c. Prima facie, the unit price performance has been a bit of a yawn, however a 15% appreciation in a market that has been increasingly on the nose (market was down over 2% today (1 December) is actually pretty good.

I think the price could appreciate more (and has been higher - please note I have previously sold some stock at higher levels). Certainly there have been sellers of the stock lately, however if management can keep etching out NTA growth the unit price will invariably start moving again. The stock is trading at a big discount to NTA and has lots of cash so the margin of safety is high in my opinion, so for me it's justified holding on looking for more gains. 

Kristian

Disclosure: own APW

Monday, 17 November 2014

Australasian Wealth Investments (AWI)

I noted today that Andrew Barnes resigned as a Director of AWI. Mr Barnes was Chairman of AWI when the company bought van Eyk Research, which subsequently went bust. It is very rare for management to admit to mistakes, so it is commendable that Mr. Barnes has chosen to do so publicly. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: no position in AWI

Hastings High Yield Fund (HHY)

As noted a few times, one of the mandates I gave myself in this blog was to examine previous trades, including trades not taken. As a stock market investor, I see my job simply as to produce low-risk alpa as cheaply as possible; just like a German car manufacturer aims to produce quality cars while always minimising cost. So to do that, part of my process is to analyse past decisions and see what could be done better.  

The purpose of this post is to conduct a postmortem of my decision on HHY. 

I bought and sold HHY last year and made zero profit. 

My last note on HHY was September 2013 and the price was then 37.5c, so let's use that as the base line for analysis. 

HHY is now 17.5c, however there have a been further capital repayment of 3.59c (ex 24 September 13) and 25.8c (29 July 2014). The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of what I have left on the table is 27.4% p.a. That's huge!

HHY has performed has a lot better than expected: it has chunked out lots of capital return quickly, thanks to the repayment of the Maher Terminals investment which I may or may not have determined might occur if I did more homework. So while I knowingly left money on the table, I had no idea I was leaving 27.4% p.a. behind. 

Anyway, from a return perspective, I made a mistake. 

From a risk perspective, I feel a little better about my decision. Looking back at that last post, my decision to exit was based on not being comfortable I would not get the return I want if everything did not work out fine and not having a big enough position to warrant the time to get to know the underlying investments better. 

To minimise risk, one approach that has worked very for well me has been to pyramid into positions... I buy a bit if my initial research stacks up, a bit more as I get more comfortable and keep buying all the way up to my target allocation. This has the dual benefit of helping to overcome paralysis by analysis (I actually tend to get on with my decision a bit quicker now as I'm only starting with a smaller stake) and if I realise I am wrong after doing further research, the overall % damage to my portfolio is very small. The flexibility of fluidity in my decisions has been a fantastic addition to my investment process. 

So I was clearly wrong to dump HHY on the basis of having a small position. This ought to have been the trigger point to do more research and buy more stock if I believed the story was sound, and not just flippantly say I can spend my time better elsewhere. 

This is not the first time I have left a stock because I didn't think the upside was enough only to be surprised by how well the stock performs. AIX and GPG come to mind immediately. So perhaps, I need to get a little better at trust, which also means doing more homework. Often cigar-butts are not massively underpriced, but underpriced just enough to be of little interest to people yet actually provide solid returns. 

And to be honest, one of my personal problems is I get bored with situations. Often, the better thing to do is be patient and just walk away and let competent management do it's thing. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: no position in HHY


Friday, 7 November 2014

Harness Asset Management - HAM!!!

It is with pleasure I can announce the launch of Harness Asset Management today (Friday 7 November).

Harness is being founded by my friend and fellow value sleuth, Nigel Littlewood. The investment committee is made up of Nigel, me, Matthew Kidman and Paul Hinds. A bunch of pretty hard headed value guys with our own money in the game.

The business is founded on value investing principles and a culture of prioritising the interests of clients ahead of our own. 

The fee structure is focussed on being rewarded for performance. Harness is open to investors who qualify as wholesale investors only. Please see the website for more details www.harnessam.com.au

Have a great weekend... 

Kristian 

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Devine (DVN)

I own DVN and was doing well until the recent volatility caused me some sweaty moments. With small-caps, every now and again you see a monster sell-down in price on almost no volume. I'm getting better at buying very aggressively when a stock I know well does this, although in the case of DVN I already had my full allocation. I can think of 4-5 stocks straight off the top of my head that have dropped 20%+ when the price was already cheap and then watch the stock rebound sharply. 

We think DVN has been volatile thanks to no news flow about the sale of the company since August. During that time, we understand a lot of parties have expressed interest in the business and a tender process has been underway. But without any actual news from the company itself, investors would understandably be flighty. 

The profit guidance was on balance positive and is consistent with improved conditions. Note, my reason for buying in the first place was a big discount to NTA and a turn-around in positive news. The proposed sale of the business was good fortune. But the main driver for the share price in the short term now is a potential sale and the company anticipates a result, if any, will be completed by the end of the CY. So not long now. 

Should the sale fall over, DVN is still trading well below NTA and conditions look okay. So while the price will probably fall, I don't anticipate it being a disaster. On the upside, there could be as much as 30-40c. So on a current price of $1, that continues to look pretty attractive to me. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: own DVN

Sunday, 2 November 2014

Noni B (NBL)


NBL was a trade I was hoping to make a return of 3-4 times. I came out break-even! Pictured above, NBL is a struggling woman's clothing retailer with sliding sales and an even greater sliding share price. See the share price graph below from 2010 to now:


The stock has been dirt cheap on a historical basis (e.g. at 50c, the market cap is $16m v 2014 sales of $112m), but in my opinion quite rightly so - the company has just not 'got it right' and as revenues have slipped, the effect on the P&L has been magnified thanks to a high fixed cost base. Feedback I have received is that introducing the more expensive but brand-equity devoid name Liz Jordan into the stores has not worked, the company still uses local (and therefore far more expensive suppliers ) and poor inventory purchasing. So couple that with a deteriorating balance sheet, it was/is conceivable the company could go bust.

I got interested in NBL when some opposing white knights came on to the scene, namely Alceon and Gannet Capital. Gannet is run by Glen Poswell who I have met previously and strikes me as a seriously smart operator. Alceon made a takeover bid for all of the company while Gannett subsequently bought a blocking stake and proposed that the company stay listed so shareholders could choose to participate in the turnaround of the company, touch wood.

I wanted to hold-on to NBL to hopefully earn a multi-bag return through the turnaround of the business. In simplistic terms, take the market cap of $16m plus a capital raise of ~$10m would bring the effective entry price to $26m. Conceivably, with some inventory cost cutting and a turnaround in sales, EBITDA could be ~$8m and applying a multiple of 10* could see the market cap eventually move up to $80m excluding any dividends paid along the way. Yes, the company could go bust however with at least one of the white knights likely to win the day, I didn't judge that probability as high.

And I personally think the Noni-B brand name is actually pretty strong with middle(ish) age women in Australia: it has been around for a long time, has been fairly consistent in its model and has high brand name recognition. We visited some stores around the Sydney region and concluded the stores looked clean, appropriate and respectable. It reminded me a little of visiting Coles in 2007 (when Wesfarmers was in the process of taking them over): they just need to put some more of the right stuff on the shelves!

Anyway, the original condition of the Alceon bid had a minimum acceptance of 90%. Gannett had managed to get ~11% of the share register and therefore enough to block the original bid. However that condition was waived by Alceon which basically removed hopes that Gannett could win the takeover. So where we now stand is that Alceon has an offer of 51c and has 62% of the register. Sure, a higher bid might come along but I don't think that's likely (read the bidders statement...). A bit annoying, but the main point was that risk was managed. I recently sold.

Kristian 

Disclosure: no position in NBL 

Wednesday, 8 October 2014

Elon Musk

This post isn't exactly a cigar-butt idea, nor is it timely but nevertheless I thought you might find it interesting. I enjoy reading about truly successful people - and I don't mean the Bondi hipster types. Elon Musk is one such person. A true super star. He walked away with $180m from his share of PayPal and proceeded to invest in not one, but three incredibly risky but potentially humanity improving start-ups: SolarCity, Tesla, and SpaceX

What I find even more incredible about this story is that he stood behind the companies with his own and it got to the point where all of his PayPal money was committed to these projects and ended up having to borrow money from friends to pay rent.  That's true grit.

A good interview can be seen here (around the 9.30 mark):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uegOUmgKB4E

Kristian 

Disclosure: no position in the above companies. 

Monday, 29 September 2014

Medibank Private Health Insurance

Medibank has been put up for sale by the Australian government. 

Medibank is Australia's largest private health insurer by Premium Revenue, however it has the second highest Management Expense Ratio (MER) just behind HBF (source: Morningstar). The prospectus has not been published however in my opinion some of the salient points are: 
  • Potentially massive opportunity for cost-cutting in the hands of private operators
  • Private health insurance is a growing and stable market
  • Potential for the IPO pricing to be very reasonable

We need to wait and see what is contained in the prospectus before worrying about things too much. The main purpose of this post is to flag with interested eligible readers to pre-register their interest at the following address: 


Pre-registration closes 15 October. 

I will write some follow-up analysis when the prospectus is released. 

As an aside... 

Perhaps this is wishful thinking, but it could be a superb catalyst to help draw retail investors back to the share market. Previous floats such as Telstra and Commonwealth Bank created an army of share investors and it was a great shame to see so many people burned through the GFC process. The government gives out hand outs to entice people into the property market, so why not do the same for share investors. Handing Medibank out at a big fat discount would do the job! 

Kristian

Disclosure: no position in Medibank (but hold a policy)

Friday, 19 September 2014

VIX revisited

I did a very quick post back in June noting the very low VIX level. Since then, VIX has remained very compressed and at very low levels: 


That chart (source: Yahoo Finance) goes back to 1990 and shows that current VIX levels are bouncing along at all time lows. VIX is seen by many as the canary in the coal mine: low VIX = low volatility = high investor complacency = time to be really scared. This has plenty of people worried, including famed deep value investor Seth Klarman who in a recent letter noted the 'bubble in complacency' and cited worrying tell-tale signs of investor behaviour. 

The last time when VIX was ultra cheap for a sustained period was 2004 to early 2007 during the great stock market boom. Shortly after VIX started moving high in lock-step with the stock market wobbling then crashing. The low VIX period before that was roughly 1992 to the early 1996. VIX then moved aggressively higher, so you would guess that the stock market tanked, right? Let's take November 1995 as a data point: VIX 12, S&P500 630. Fastforward to November 1999: VIX has through some savage peaks and troughs moved to 25 and S&P500 has actually moved up to 1400. 

That's almost a two and a half-fold increase in the market (excluding dividends) during a period of rapidly increasing volatility. And that's even after the S&P500 had already risen substantially. 

These are only a few points in history, so it's difficult to make assumptions. I don't work at Renaissance after all. I do however think it's fair to say that low volatility does not automatically mean tough times ahead. Interesting, anyway.    

Kristian 

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

Boom Logistics (BOL)

Just a short note to say well done to Iona Mcpherson, the outgoing CFO at BOL. Incredibly tough job in an industry experiencing a cyclical down-turn. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: own BOL

Friday, 12 September 2014

RNY Property Trust (RNY): Scuttlebutt Edition

Acknowledgement: this trade idea was presented to me by various colleagues, and is very well documented by Forager Funds. I've honestly no idea who came up with this idea first - however for ethical purposes I want to disclose it is not my original idea. It does however fit my cigar-butt style, and therefore I am an owner of the stock. 

With a stock price of ~28c and NTA of AUD 51c (30 June) the discount-to-value is straightforward to see. There are however issues namely a flat suburban commercial office market in the US, no distributions (and none likely until 2016), restrictive debt covenants and CAPEX requirements  to reduce the vacancy rate. Some of my colleagues think it is a value-trap, and they are potentially correct. I have been a buyer given the big discount, and expecting the discount should close when conditions improve at the fund and a way to get some USD exposure.

I visited RNY following a visit management (RXR Realty) in Long Island November last year, and I also just visited New York / Long Island - not to meet management but to snoop around a bit more to get some scuttlebutt.

Here is some of the information I found:

As background, RNY owns commercial office properties in the suburban markets of Long Island, Connecticut, New Jersey and Westchester. The problem with this geographical spread is that it is still dormant despite inner New York such as Manhattan and Brooklyn performing well (both residential and commercial). The ripple effect for commercial offie hasn't spread out to the suburbs. This appears to be the case across the US, as it appears to be for Australia (I suspect true of many countries).

On the flip side, minimal new supply is coming on-line and developers simply don't build commercial property without securing committed sales or leases. Incentives are still aggressive - even up to 1 year in the case of 5-6 year leases. The consistent message was the commercial suburban leasing market is recovering, but ever so slowly. You're not going to make a ton of money quickly from RNY in the short term due to an influx of new tenants to soak up vacant stock.

RXR have a great reputation on Long Island according to the people I spoke to (who have been dealing with RXR for years). My own observation is that while they appear to be good operators, they have bigger fish to fry (Manhattan) for the time being and RNY is not a high priority until vacancies drastically reduce and/or the re-financing is complete (long story: debt covenants restrict distributions and spending on CAPEX which in-turn is holding back attracting good tenants - a catch 22 that is not easily solved in the short term).

The average cap rate across the RNY portfolio is 8%, however anecdotally I heard that cap rates are starting to compress to less than 8%, although I did not receive firm data to back this view up.

In summary, I didn't find information that was in conflict with RXRs position. This situation could take a while (18 months) to work out, however the share price allows for that. If we do happen to get a strengthening USD and/or improved property prices then the upside is even bigger (or reverse).

Kristian 

Disclosure: own RNY

Friday, 22 August 2014

Boom Logistics (BOL)

In my previous post I cracked it about the yet-again deferral of the share buy-back. We recently met with management to discuss the situation further. In a nutshell, the main focus is conservatism, with debt reduction being a key theme along with reducing costs. A debt facility of $105m (total debt is currently $98m, net debt $89m) needs to be paid down to $75m by January 2017. With the combination of some more asset sales and free cash-flow from operations, I think they will get there much faster than that date. 

While paying down debt does not have the same potential impact on the share price in the short term as a buy-back, shareholders can at least have some comfort that money is not being squandered or misallocated on projects that may or may not work. Every dollar of debt reduction reduces risk (and also reduces the banks bargaining power) and therefore increases the value of the equity.   

The fact they are making any money at all given they have such a big exposure to mining is probably testament to management making hard decisions and being conservative. 

However the market is wary of BOL thanks in part to missed assertions/forecasts by management. This reputation needs to be repaired, and I can only hope they don't come out and make promises in the future they don't deliver on. 

Over capacity of cranes in Australia is an ongoing issue and will take some time to fix however there appears to be a reasonable overseas market which BOL has sold some older stock into. I think it would be interesting for an entrepreneur/private equity firm to run the numbers to see if an arbitrage could be made by buying cranes in Australia and selling them overseas. BOL is an operator of cranes, not a trader, so it's not likely they will go down that track. In the meantime, life for crane operators could easily get worse before it gets better. 

While I'm sounding like a broken record about a share buy-back, the logic of my investment in BOL is straightforward and remains the same: with current management I don't think the company will go broke. And the upside is massive compared to the downside - even if you think it could go broke. Nicholas Taleb preaches the idea of embracing optionality, which is what I found at APW. BOL has does lots of problems but optionality galore. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: own BOL

Monday, 18 August 2014

Australasian Wealth Investments (AWI, nee AWK and MEF)

Previous article here.

I previously had a position in AWI some months ago and managed to lose some money on the trade, despite having identified a good opportunity before most others in the market. In my last post, I noted how AWI (which was previously an LIC called MEF) was transformed into a financial services business. The initial story was InvestSmart was bought (for a song) as a managed fund distribution platform and a stake in van Eyk Research was also purchased. Coupling the two together would be the seedling of an Australian business to one day rival businesses such as the UK Best Invest and Hargreaves Lansdown. And after meeting with management a few times, I concluded I really liked the idea, management and the (then) cheap valuation.

Amazing how things can change. 

Subsequently, a new CEO was inserted on a monster salary and the company also went on an acquisition frenzy. This not only added unnecessary cost, but very quickly, the initial strategy seemed to be blurred as new acquisitions were made on bigger multiples. It's really hard to buy businesses quickly and try and glue them together, and the businesses they bought appeared disparate to the initial vision for the business. Without going into it, van Eyk clearly has lots of problems. Buying Intelligent Investor for over 6 times earnings was probably paying twice what it is worth, especially in the context they had already launched a managed funds business and therefore people in their database that were agreeable to a managed fund product had probably already invested with them (now Forager). 

After pondering this trade, I conclude my reasons for buying were pretty solid and pretty much within my investment style. The mistake made was to hold as the leopard begun to change its spots and holding on for the 'concept', not value. That style of investing is for others, and not me. 

For me, it has become increasingly easy to decide whether to make stock decisions based not on how cool the story sounds, but simply whether it fits my value investing style. This approach saves a lot of work, imposes a good discipline, and oh - makes more money. 

Kristian

Disclosure: no position in AWI

Thursday, 24 July 2014

Analyst Position (Short Term)

We are looking to back-test two different strategies, using data from the Australian stock market. This would be an ideal short-term project for someone to get their teeth stuck into - potentially ideal for a uni student looking for some extra cash and some work experience. Being Sydney based is preferable.  

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you are interested. 

Kristian 

Monday, 21 July 2014

Devine Ltd (DVN)

Following the recent announcement by DVN that majority shareholder Leighton (LEI, 50.6%) intended to sell all of it's shares, the market was further updated that both Leighton and the board of DVN now believe it is in the best interests of all shareholders to consider a sale of the business. 

This is  potentially great news for the rest of the DVN shareholders. 

I can understand LEI potentially being happy to take less than NTA on their holding so they can clean up their own balance sheet, however the board of DVN would have a difficult time convincing the rest of us this would be a great result. 


The property market has not collapsed since then, and barring any further mega write-downs like we have seen, NTA should not move too much.

So with the stock at $1.07, the potential magnitude of upside still warrants holding, in my opinion. If a sale does not eventuate, I'm left with what looks to be an improving business selling for less than physical value.

Kristian

Disclosure: own DVN

Friday, 18 July 2014

Harness Asset Management

I am really proud to have been appointed to the Investment Committee at Harness Asset Management. The fund has been established by Nigel Littlewood and we are based at Macquarie St here in Sydney. Nigel and I have known each other for over ten years having some brief dealings when Nigel was CEO of MMC Asset Management but more notably I took over Nigel's job as CEO of The Rivkin Report in 2008 when the ASX was at all time highs. He went on holiday and in my new role got a real baptism by fire thanks to the ensuing GFC. I have almost forgiven him for that. 

I left that role at the end of 2012 and started this blog at the same time with the firm view of honing my investment style and using that skill to build my family's self managed superannuation fund into a genuine wealth creation vehicle to firstly provide my parents with a great retirement income so they can do the things they want and to build the fund into a seriously big portfolio over the next 20-30 years when it will be my time to fully retire (I'm 40). I'm on track, but I still have a lifetime of things to learn. 

Because I have a lot on the line, I take my investments seriously. If I buy shares in a company, I'm legally part of owner of that company and I expect management to act both morally and in the interests of the owners of the company. If not, I'm happy to go on the offensive if the upside is warranted.  

We focus mostly on small Australian listed companies. It's quite un-original to say that the  smaller end of the market is under-researched, but it's 100% true.  

We're value investors. We're value investors because it works. Throughout history, the bulk of the outstanding investors come from the the value school. There are exceptions to this, of course. For example I went to the Monaco GP this year and plonked in front of the apartment we were staying in was a monster yacht owned by the co-CEO of Renaissance Technologies: the US hedge fund manager who employ super smart cookies sniffing out and exploiting pricing anomalies. Unfortunately we're not super smart and prefer to just buy things on the cheap and wait for the market to re-rate them. 

We're always on the sniff for bargains and love networking both here and overseas looking for insights and ideas. Please don't hesitate to contact if you have further queries or want to discuss ideas. 

Kristian 

Thursday, 17 July 2014

Boom Logistics (BOL)


I'm frustrated. 

BOL announced full year results, which didn't look particularly divergent to expectations. Goodwill has been written down by $70m which is pretty massive considering intangibles at 31 December were $74.018m. But not really surprising considering the consistent underperformance of the business. The more notable parts of the announcement from an asset perspective are the write-downs in assets-held-for-sale of $4.5m and a $5m hit to 'fixed assets in WA'. Considering assets-held-for-sale at 30 June will be ~$15m, the $5m write-down is a big hit. The other write-down is against assets of ~$100m, so the ~5% hit isn't so bad. 

Full year 'Trading' EBIT is $13.8m. Considering NTA is $232m (which is net of debt), the ROA is appallingly low. Margin compression and under-utilisation are the culprits however note this can of course easily flip the other way leading to a rapid spike in ROA. Certainly the current economic value of the assets are suspect.  

So, anyway...
  • NTA is 49c 
  • The current price is 13.5c
  • If you believe the figures, BOL is a truly eye-popping discount to NTA of 72%

And this is the frustrating part. Management have previously re-iterated the scope for a buy-back given the recognised massive discount to NTA, yet do precisely nothing about it. As highlighted in the update, they have spent $16m on new kit this year, which in itself seems pretty ballsy given every man and his dog know the mining sector is done for the time being. Why on they continue to buy new kit and not just buy-back stock is still beyond me. 

The update made no mention of the buy-back. 

Nor have insiders been buying stock. 

So no buy-back, no insiders buying the stock, hardly any professional in the market wanting to touch the stock AND management buying new kit when assets are delivering sub-par returns. It doesn't add up. 

I am either missing something here, the NTA just can't be believed and/or management are just poor capital allocators and therefore should be replaced. 

I really hope I am missing something. I'm more than happy to admit a mistake - I've plenty of those in my lifetime. 

I am writing to management asking for an update on the buy-back. I intend to be more vocal on this issue.  

Kristian 

Disclosure: own BOL

Thursday, 10 July 2014

Healthscope Notes (HLNG, HLNGA)

See here for the last article.

Healthscope is re-emerging on the ASX after being under the tender loving care of private equity since 2010. As a result, HLNG/HLNGA will today (COB, Thursday 10 July) cease trading from the ASX. Note holders will have the option to redeem for cash or convert to ordinary shares. Being a previous holder of the notes, I feel somewhat familiar with the background and so spent some time considering whether to buy the notes to convert into shares or just apply for shares in the IPO.

I recently re-bought HLNG with the idea of looking for a stag profit, however on further thought I reversed that view and decided against the trade and sold them - at a very small loss. Every broker seems to be touting the reasons to apply for stock in the IPO. The rationale seems pretty reasonable: a) healthcare provider (great business, and not many listed in Australia) b) lots of stock in escrow c) lots of stock given preference to HLNG/HLNGA to convert d) cheaper than Ramsay Healthcare (RHC) and e) index funds will need to buy the stock. All this adds up to the idea the stock is in short supply relative to demand.

On reflection, these are all market based reasons for the trade. I'm not good at trying to out guess what other people in the market are doing: I want to find the $1 for 50c trades. The fundamentals are not cheap in an absolute sense, and that is after trying to be generous with future projections. The other concerning factor is who exactly is the patsy in the trade? One of the hot topics of recent years has been the danger in buying from private equity. And yet here we are with people apparently clambering over themselves to buy a stock with a PE of 20-23 because it is cheaper than RHC.

It would be irresponsible of me (not to mention illegal) to suggest Healthscope would be a good/bad stag potential. There are far better market animals than me, especially in large caps. Just look at RHC: I've watched that triple in price and I missed it the whole way! For my own portfolio and learning, I am sticking to my own style of investing and therefore leaving this one alone. Not fundamentally cheap. Buying from really smart guys. Not enough (perceived) upside at least in the short-medium term. No particular analytical edge or insight.

Kristian

Disclosure: no position in the above names

Friday, 27 June 2014

Galileo Japan Trust (GJT)

Since my last post on on GJT, the stock has plodded along pretty well and in all honesty has been a bit of a sleeper - not causing me massive headaches unlike some other stocks! Good management, good discount, good yield - a solid story. It's one of those stocks that when you reflect on a little bit you wish every stock in your portfolio was like that.

As a side note, one of the reasons for keeping this blog is to improve my accountability by presenting ideas in a public forum. I hope this improves my education and therefore future performance. This process has initially worked well. In September last year, I did a quick comparison of GJT v AJA. It appeared to me GJT was cheaper, however the share price of AJA has since performed much better than GJT unfortunately meaning I am wrong or there are other market dynamics at play in the short term. A much-smarter-than-me fund manager at the time who knew Japan much better actually said AJA was the better buy. So I will need to go back and do a postmortem on this one.

Anyway, GJT management have announced the sale of a relatively small property in the portfolio ($6.2m v the portfolio net assets of $229m). So it's pretty small however the property was sold at a big premium to book and the really impressive part is management have been very sensible in indicating proceeds should be returned to shareholders via a buy-back of units - which are cheap in my opinion. As Nigel and I noted in the Capital Management post, how managers allocate capital is one of the few factors that determine long term performance: it's one area we pay incredibly close attention to and its good to see GJT making seemingly a good capital allocation call.

Kristian

Disclosure: own GJT

Thursday, 26 June 2014

Devine Ltd (DVN)

Amazing how quickly the tide can turn in deep-value situations. I blogged about DVN last week discussing the monster discount to NTA and the first positive news in a really long time. And now major shareholder - Leighton (they own 50.6%) are considering selling their stake, which potentially opens up the company to a full takeover bid. 

I just had lunch here in Sydney with some market colleagues discussing how tough trading takeover arbitrages have become: for me it is incredibly tough work to trying to second guess what other people are up to, compared to finding '$1 trading for 50c' trades. And so it is with DVN: I don't know what the next corporate move from here is.  

Funnily enough, a rapidly advancing share price can be a nuisance: I wanted to buy a chunk more stock following some more research, however as the share price has gone up the potential return on my research time has gone down. There are of course worse problems to have. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: own DVN


Wednesday, 25 June 2014

Boom Logistics (BOL)

Cranes On Sale

So far the call on BOL hasn't gone the right way. The price is still substantially below NTA: market cap of $59.4m v NTA of $245m. The gap continues to grow as the stock flounders - bit frustrating really. In my opinion, what would really help to close the gap is a solid buy-back. So instead of using cash to pay down debt and buy new cranes, it strikes me as a far better capital allocation idea to buy-back stock therefore buying assets for ~ 1/4 of the price. Maybe better still - trim back on the crane fleet and use funds to buy back shares for a superb arbitrage opportunity - just like GJT have announced. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: own BOL 

Tuesday, 17 June 2014

Devine Ltd (DVN)

Devine is an Australian residential and commercial property developer. Times have been pretty tough in recent years, and the stock getting back down to multi-decade lows:


The stock took a belting in October last year when it announced a likely write-down in the carrying value of its stock by ~$70m. This was huge considering total inventory at June 30 was $390.5m. I really don't want to buy in situations where NTA is still declining (unless the discount is massive) and expose my portfolio to the 'cockroach effect' - the term used to describe how companies tend to make a lot more than one downgrade/upgrade in a row: where there is one there is more. A bit like turning the kitchen light on in a apartment I rented near Bondi in the middle of the night: the little pr$cks where everywhere. And so it has been with DVN. Just reading back through recent years annual reports and updates shows plenty of negativity. The following table from the CY2013 Annual Report (page 82) succinctly summarises the situation: 


Note the rapid decline in Net tangible assets per share at 31 December to $1.52. The share price is currently $0.93. DVN has typically operated in the mid-price house range, so the tough times of recent years are to be expected: apart from the recent growth spurt in prime spots such as Sydney and Melbourne, general property prices have yet to move significantly upward in Australia. I was just in London and the exact same trend is happening there: London has moved strongly, the rest of the country lagged. Even if we don't see a big upward movement in non-prime property prices, I suspect just some non-negativity or normalisation will allow DVN and others to start shaking the blues.

Recently the first upgrade in years recently came through - a very bullish upgrade to full year earnings forecast (CY12). Since the news announcement, the stock has rallied quite a bit and some of the negativity has been removed from the stock. The trick now is to determine whether the bad news is over for DVN as the potential upside from here is quite huge should more positive news emerge. And to do that I need to actually get in the field and see how things are really going before building my stake further.

Kristian 

Disclosure: own a small position in DVN. 

Tuesday, 3 June 2014

VIX

VIX getting toward all time lows...


Kristian

Thursday, 15 May 2014

AIMS Property Securities Fund (APW)

Apologies: I have been madly setting up a private business of late and have not been blogging much. 

I'm wrapped with the progress at APW, despite admittedly being a big critic over the last year.

The share price has been given a decent boost thanks to the court victory, which on paper is worth ~3c per share, lifting the NTA to over 15c (compared to the current price of 10c). I had no idea who would win the case: I bought APW at a massive discount to NTA when everyone hated it and assuming there was no value in the case, meaning the legal action was a free option. Free is my favourite word. The main trick has been to hold, let the story unfold and wait for the market to get more comfortable with it. Even if the court case falls over, it is still trading at a discount to NTA. 

Now just need to find some more stocks like this... 

Kristian

Disclosure: own APW

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

David Jones Ltd (DJS)

As you may know, DJS is currently $3.92 and there is a fairly solid bid on the table for $4. Existing shareholders at 10 April will also receive a 10c fully franked dividend. The takeover arbitrageurs recommend buying the stock for a 2.0% return (excluding the dividend) plus potentially more upside should a higher bid develop. 

So is it a buy? For me personally, I am increasingly wary of quick small profit opportunities. They usually don't work out as well as expected, are very time consuming, hugely stressful, and the opportunity cost is huge. So increasingly I'm restricting myself to deep value ideas that have substantial upside that I don't have to watch the screen daily and stress about. So with all this in mind, my benchmark is that I only buy DJS if I am not concerned  to see the deal fall over and continue to hold it as an investment with the potential for lots of upside.

Will the deal succeed? Woolworths (South Africa) wants to buy DJS through a scheme-of-arrangement meaning at least 75% of all DJS shareholders will need to vote in favour. This shouldn't be a major problem. The bigger problem will be that Woolworths shareholders are also required to separately vote on the takeover and also agree to a very big capital raising. It would be silly to think this is a certainty. So while I have no view on whether the deal will complete, it is certainly not a lay-down. And the most likely Australian buyer, Myer, has declared it won't be bidding for DJS which massively reduces the odds of a bidding war.

The extreme pessimism has dissipated from the stock reminding me of the Howard Marks quote "If I were asked to name just one way to figure out whether something is a bargain or not, it would be through assessing how much optimism is incorporate in its price".

DJS has a market capitalisation of $2.11bn and owns an unbelievably well located property portfolio with brokers valuing it anywhere from $500m to $1bn (the big variable being the development potential in the Sydney Market St property). Zero net debt. Let's keep things simple and take an average estimated value of the property at $750m. That leaves the rest of the business valued by the market at $1.36bn. Very crudely, adding some additional rent back in to the P&L produces a full year estimated NPAT of ~$100m. This gives a PE of 14. Going forward profits may move higher or lower depending on management and just how much impact the internet will have etc - I will smarter people than me decide that. The valuation isn't actually so high, but not exactly deep value.  There are other ways to look at valuation and I may be wrong of course, but for me I want simple cigar butt stories.

In short, I can't see large gains to be made from here and potentially lots of headaches so it's not the stock for me. 

Regards, 

Kristian 

Disclosure: no position in DJS

Wednesday, 19 March 2014

AIMS Property Securities Fund (APW)

APW would be happy with some decent coverage in yesterdays The Australian quoting an analyst at Clime Investment Management (CIW) who cited the big discount to NTA, recommencement of distributions and stock buy-back among other things. This is all true, although readers of this blog will know I (and others) have been slightly less gushing in praise. 

Deciding to withdraw the DRP was also sensible and pragmatic. 

The price has marched a bit higher, although is still well south of the NTA. So the investment idea remains intact: gains can be made from distributions and price advances due to growth in the NTA and a gradual lessening of the gap to NTA. Oh, and sprinkle in some patience. 

Kristian 

Disclosure: own APW and CIW

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

Boom Logistics (BOL)

Bombed Out Big Time

This post is written by Nigel Littlewood. We have looked at BOL extensively and we both own BOL

Boom was a classic industry consolidation play. The stock market gets taken for rides pretty regularly by wily entrepreneurs who promise riches of gold simply by buying a number of small industry participants and rolling them together (seemingly effortlessly) to create a much larger corporation with the corresponding cost savings and pricing power. Boom was to become the market leader in the crane industry by consolidating a number of acquisitions.

It’s my experience that this strategy rarely delivers on the initial promises provided while the strategy may make sense, it often fails in execution and it is one of my rules to avoid investing in such plays.  As Warren Buffett says,  “I don’t like to swing at a pitch until it’s left the pitchers hand”

Boom was one such venture that was put together and listed in Oct 2003 and continued to keep buying crane providers right into the stock market boom of 2006-2007 where its shares reached circa $5 a share before beginning a very long fall to lows of 7c last year a mighty fall of around 99%. AND that folks is why we are looking at it.

While there have been mistakes made within the business since listing, I’m not going to spend time on the history as it’s the future that will matter to us as shareholders. In 2008 the company got a new CFO, a woman called Iona Macpherson …who is probably 20% better than the average male CFO and had to be, to get the job. She is energetic, intelligent and full of enthusiasm for the progress made and the challenges ahead. We have been impressed during our limited contact with her so far. One year after Iona was appointed, a new CEO also joined her. Brenden Mitchell has had a tough job in bringing the business back from the brink. We have been impressed with both Iona and Brenden although we look forward to meeting with them regularly going forward.
Brenden has invested significant amounts of his own money in the shares at higher prices.

The shares are trading at 16c having fallen a long way from their highs. The stock is well out of favour although investors are starting to look at the stock again, management confirmed they are getting calls from professional investors both here and in the US.

Despite a dramatic slow down in the economy and a collapse in mining CAPEX spend, BOL continues to report a profit at the EBITDA line despite lower than targeted capacity utilisation rates. Since 2009 the company has maintained its margins while revenue has contracted, excess cash has been used to reduce debt from $245m to circa $105m while rev has fallen from $400m to under $280m.  EBITDA margin has actually been maintained during this time at around 17%-18%.  

So far management has given us confidence that they are honest and competent…let’s hope nothing happens to change this view.

Secondly, we are seeing a pick up in construction and housing, and expect increased spending on infrastructure in Australia in the years ahead, it was even discussed at the recent G20 summit held in Sydney. The very soft conditions in mining maintenance should pick up albeit we expect margins will be under pressure but BOL management seems intent on maintaining a disciplined approach to pricing with a long-term goal of tripling return on invested capital.

So to summarise, things are very tough in this industry but hey that’s why we are looking at it, if things were going well the shares wouldn’t be at 16c.

So how do the financials look right now?
Share price             16c
Shares                     $469m
Mkt Cap                 $75m
Current Net Debt    $105m
EV                            $180m

                                    2014(f)
EBITDA                       $50m
NPAT:                           $9m
Free Cash flow           $30m (this will probably fall to $20m in 2015 due a lack of asset sales)
Net tangible assets    $250m

So this year we have:
free cashflow multiple:         under 3x.
EBITDA multiple:                  under 4x
EBIT multiple:                       8.4x
p/e                                          8.2x
Int cover                                 6x       
div yield                                 0

On the face of it, current earnings look pretty attractive but not super exciting. However, it is trading at around a third of NTA so while I concede we don’t want to be a seller of a large fleet of cranes in a fire sale, its an indication of just how bombed out the stock is. The potential upside in this stock isn’t created by the current earning’s environment. Indeed it’s created by an (even slight) improvement in revenue and a corresponding holding or improvement of margin.

In the event that revenues go half way back to where they were in 2009, we would see the company generating EBITDA of around $60m (assuming margin stability) providing an ebitda multiple of 3x. With any sign of improvement in the macro environment, this stock has significant upside potential. The market has a bearish bias on BOL right now (with fair reason) but with a shift in that attitude towards a more neutral view, an EBITDA multiple of 6x would not be unreasonable, combined with an improved bottom line and the stock could go much higher.

When we bought PMP at 15c, the stock was being priced for going broke…imminently and that investment has delivered returns of 200% so far so you don’t need much of a market shift to see strong upside…but you do need patience.

Management has suggested it would like to buy back stock when debt is under $100m which should be post the end of the current fiscal year, assuming revenues are stable, its hard to see why the company wouldn’t buy stock back at a third of NTA.

So we have a pretty well-run business in a tough industry at a challenging point in the cycle trading at reasonable multiples if things are stable to better going forward. For patient investors this stock has the capacity to deliver significant upside while downside is somewhat underpinned by a big discount to NTA, and management’s intention to cut fixed costs further. This isn’t a stock for those with a negative view on Australia but with a modest improvement in mining maintenance spend, a pick up in infrastructure activity and continued pick up in building, this stock will make more money and its low multiples will increase. At some point in the next decade (or so) this stock will probably be the darling of the cycle again and the market will like it and that will be the time to sell.

As the old saying goes: Buy in gloom, sell in boom.


Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Clime Investment Management (CIW)

In the previous post I referred to a company run by management with a sensible approach to capital management. CIW is like The Magic Pudding - it just keeps giving thanks to its strong cash-flow being deployed on shareholder favourable terms: ordinary and special dividends, buy-backs and conservative investments. This is not a cigar-butt story. This is a fair price for a good company story that should - touch wood - continue to reward shareholders through growing dividends and share price. 

CIW is mostly a financial services business comprising cash, a funds management business, investment in its own managed funds, a stock-market research business and also owns a business supplying stationery and office supplies. Half year results have just been posted  - here is a summary of the balance sheet: 


CIW has provided the value of Cash, Managed Fund Investments and Jasco. It is up to us to value the stock-market research and funds management businesses to get an overall valuation of the company. Here is a breakdown of the revenue/profitability for the last

StocksInValue is a subscription service to help value investors find cheap stocks. It was folded into a JV with the popular Eureka Report (owned by Newscorp), which in my opinion was an excellent move to increase brand awareness for the Clime funds business. The JV is losing a bit of money at the moment, and I'm not sure if you can get too excited about a valuation for that type of business. For the purposes of this analysis and to keep things simple, I am valuing it as zero as a stand-alone business.

This leaves the funds management business. CIW has have just launched an international fund to leverage off the success of its successful Australian stock focused business. FUM growth for its local funds continues to impress: up from $448m 30 June to $527m by the end of December. Given the leverage to FUM growth (costs don't increase anywhere near as fast as revenue when FUM grows), the value of a funds business can increase exponentially. Let's assume ongoing MER and performance fees are 1% p.a. (which will mean CIW isn't making much performance fee revenue). At $527m revenue is $5.27m p.a. At $1bn, revenue is $10m p.a. I doubt if expenses will increase by more than $1m at the same time - probably a lot less. Conservatively the funds business could be valued at $30m based on current FUM and easily double if it reaches $1bn. Let's stick with $30m Stripping out intangibles and adding in $30m gives a loose value of $46.9m or 94c: a little bit above the current price of 86c. Please note these are my valuations only and should not be relied upon.

Kristian 

Disclosure: own CIW

Please get in touch! I am always on the lookout for interesting stock ideas, with a particular emphasis on deep-value, growth companies run by outstanding management and arbitrage opportunities.